While this case might illustrate that things are changing a bit, China still has a
well-deserved reputation as the copycat center of the world. The list of stories about product piracy and intellectual property (IP) theft in the
country seems endless and includes such prominent examples as copy Rolex watches, fake Louis Vuitton handbags, illicit Microsoft Windows clones,
pirated Avatar DVDs, or unauthorized reprints of the Da Vinci Code.
This problem is by no means limited to China. Nor is it restricted to consumer markets.
Fake aircraft parts and counterfeit medicines have surfaced all over the world, with countries of origin ranging from Nigeria and India to Taiwan and
Singapore. Such examples may be particularly worrisome, but they represent only the tip of an iceberg of cases where stolen intellectual property
damaged company profits, jeopardized brand values, and in some instances, even put lives at risk.
Niche luxury brands and industrial behemoths alike are struggling to come up with
effective counterstrategies for this complex challenge. In designing such strategies, these aspects warrant particular attention:
• Economic factors. While far from being the only contributor,
the overall economic situation of a country strongly influences people’s attitudes towards IP protection. As a rule of thumb, the lesser
developed the country, the higher the likelihood of IP theft and product piracy.
• Cultural values. Although the concept of intellectual property
protection is a relatively new one, related cultural attitudes anchor deep in the fabric of any society. The United Kingdom established fundamental
rules for copyright and patent protection as early as the 17th century. In contrast, Chinese and Koreans, for example, have a tradition of great
admiration towards ancient masters who copied the works of others and further perfected it. Some experts believe that the concept of IP protection
and copyright "is the product of Western societal development ... and remains a foreign, indeed strange, concept in many other societies."
• Legal environment. A well-established legal framework for
copyright and patent protection is a requirement for membership in the World Trade Organization. In fact, as a consequence of globalization, most
countries around the world have adopted these fundamental concepts in their legal systems. Nevertheless, differences between these systems can be
significant and require carefully analyzing each country’s set of pertaining laws.
• Viability and cost of legal enforcement. This is where things
get most sketchy. A country such as China, which modeled its IP protection framework after the European Union’s, may have great IP protection
laws. But what good are these laws if it remains hard to get local authorities to take action, judges tend to be partial to the local side, and
penalties are often so low that they do little to discourage offenders? Even though things have improved greatly in this area over the last 5-10
years, such challenges remain consid- erable in China and elsewhere.
While any individual company's strategy must factor in local specifics, industry
practices, and risks inherent to the particular markets the company serves, some recommendations apply universally:
• Closely guard your secrets. While doing so complicates the
collaboration with foreign subsidiaries or partners and potentially creates issues of trust, that price is generally worth it, especially in
• Secure strong legal protection. You can do so by registering
copyrights, applying patents, defining trade secrets and protecting them through confidentiality agreements, etc.
• Collaborate with local authorities and aggressively pursue
perpetrators. Even in countries where there may be significant enforcement hurdles, this will make you a harder target. If nothing else, the
publicity around such cases builds pressure on local governments to improve IP protection, which in this age of globalization tends to be quite
Lastly, be careful not to consider intellectual property theft a one-sided issue. A
historic example illustrates the point: in the early 1700's, Francois Xavier d’Entrecolles, a Jesuit missionary in China, communicated many details
of Chinese porcelain making, then a closely guarded secret, to contacts in his native France, where this newly acquired know-how was quickly put to
use. Chinese porcelain exports to Europe soon after declined considerably – and remained weak for more than 250 years.